Different professions require different educational qualifications to be fulfilled in order for the individuals to be qualified as a professional in their respective fields.
Read more about cancer of the penis and prostate on this site Cervical cancer Even though it is not a problem that affects males, the possibility that circumcision of boys might protect adult women from cervical cancer has been a selling point of circumcision promoters since the early twentieth century, and the notion has been heavily stressed in recent times.
This is a clever tactical move on their part, since they know that women tend to be more hostile to circumcision than men and mothers more protective of their Thesis about pimples than the father.
Cervical cancer would appear to be a powerful bogeyman to bring those obstinate anti-circumcision mothers around to the correct point of view.
Even if it was, the American legal scholar Sarah Waldeck has pointed out that Western law and medical ethics do not permit a person to be mutilated without consent in order to benefit a third party, and this is all the more impermissible if the identity, or even the existence, of the supposed beneficiary is unknown.
On top of all this, the issue is rapidly becoming irrelevant, because an effective vaccine has been developed and is being rapidly deployed. Read the argument of Sarah Waldeck. Urinary Thesis about pimples Infections UTIs Prevention of UTIs is a major selling point of circumcision advocates today, but the main reason babies get urinary tract infections usually caused when intestinal bacteria from their mother colonise the inner surface of the foreskin and then spread up the urethra is not because of the foreskin.
There is nothing wrong with benign intestinal bacteria on the inner foreskin surface; in fact, they probably keep out harmful bacteria. The main source of data for the view that uncircumcised boys are more subject to UTIs are a series of papers in the s by the American army doctor Thomas Wiswell.
Most of the uncircumcised boys in his studies were born in US military hospitals, where the rule was to retract their foreskins in infancy for cleaning purposes. This harmful practice is contrary to all current medical knowledge and is known to be a major cause of injury and infection.
It is quite likely that the higher incidence of UTIs shown by these unfortunate boys was the result of the forcible retraction of their foreskins by ignorant doctors and nurses. Urinary tract infections seem to be problem only in countries with a history of widespread circumcision, and where incorrect foreskin care such as premature retraction is thus common.
In any case, UTIs are usually minor infections which clear up quickly with antibiotics; persistent infections may indicate a malformation of the urinary tract or bladder, which will indeed require surgery, but not on the foreskin.
Read more about UTIs on this site. Sexually transmitted infections STIs It is hard to know what relevance protection against Sexually Transmitted Infections could have to babies. Anybody can catch an STI if they engage in risky sexual behaviour; nobody need get them if they play it safe.
The evidence in medical journals as to whether the presence or absence of the foreskin makes any difference to the outcome is contradictory and inconclusive; every study which claims to find a correlation has been criticised as flawed or countered by other studies that find no connection at all.
Some studies find that circumcised men are more vulnerable to some STIs. Infants and children are not at risk of STIs, because they do not engage in the kinds of sexual activity that expose them to infection.
STIs are an adult problem, and if an adult male prefers to get himself circumcised instead of wearing a condom, that is his privilege. He is not entitled to impose that choice on an innocent child. Read more about STIs on this site.
This has been a big selling point, massively promoted by the media, and has convinced many otherwise rational people that maybe circumcision is the way to go. The claim is, however, misleading because circumcision does not give immunity to HIV infection; the African experiments were on adult men, not infants or children; and the degree of risk reduction shown in the African results is not impressive.
The argument is also irrelevant because, even if circumcision did provide significant protection did, infants and boys are not at risk because they do not have sex with carriers of the virus.
The main risk factor for HIV is unprotected sex with numerous partners; if the foreskin is a factor at all, it is a very minor one, and is probably no more to blame than the mucosal surfaces of the female genitals. The argument for circumcision as a tactic against HIV is really debate about how to control AIDS in the Third World, where the disease is an epidemic mainly affecting heterosexuals, both male and female, has no relevance to conditions in developed countries, where it is a far less serious problem mainly affecting small subcultures, such as promiscuous male homosexuals and intravenous drug users.
It has no relevance at all to infants and children, who are not at risk of sexually-transmitted HIV because they do not have sex with carriers of the virus.Hypothesis: Chocolate may cause pimples. All of these are examples of hypotheses because they use the tentative word "may." However, their form in not particularly useful.
Using the word does not suggest how you would go about proving it.
If these statements had not been written carefully, they may not have been a hypotheses at all. Honey is a lovely gentle cleanser to use on damaged skin.
I often recommend it to women whose skin has become damaged (this can appear as excessive dryness or oiliness) from the use of medicated topicals for acne, such as benzoyl peroxide of salicylic acid OR from using too many products over a short period of time.
The Body Book () is a whole-body book that covers eating, exercise, and believing that your body is beautiful. Eat whole, unprocessed foods. Protein throughout the day, whole carbs, unsaturated fats, veggies and fruits. Drink lots of water. Avoid fast foods, processed foods, added sugars. Hi, I had a pimple on my cheek and I kept picking at it.
This caused multiple pimples around the area and I picked at those too. Now the pimples are all gone but my skin began to peel so I got that skin off and now the area is very red and looks like of cracked when I apply make up. This article discusses how to get rid of hard pimples.
It also looks at different kinds of pimples, their causes, and how to prevent them. The Genetic Makeup Of Humans And Animals - Even though animal experimentation can occasionally predict an accurate reaction between a chemical and human skin, “some chemicals that are harmful to animals prove valuable when used by humans.