The micmac v s the iroquois

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. The Iroquois Although the Micmac and the Iroquois Confederacy are both Aboriginal groups, they have many differences as well as similarities. One area of such, is their traditional justice systems.

The micmac v s the iroquois

Law term papers Disclaimer: Free essays on Law posted on this site were donated by anonymous users and are provided for informational use only. The free Law research paper The Micmac V S The Iroquois essay presented on this page should not be viewed as a sample of our on-line writing service.

The Iroquois Although the Micmac and the Iroquois Confederacy are both Aboriginal groups, they have many differences as well as similarities.

One area of such, is their traditional justice systems. Their governments and laws are in some ways similar, but in many ways different. The territory was subdivided in to seven districts.

Each of these districts contained family groupings in small settlements based on hunting and fishing. Their land was allotted by family. The Iroquois were a agricultural people. They lived in permanent villages in a domain now called southern Ontario, southern Quebec, and northeastern United States.

Indian Nations living here formed a formal and lasting confederacy by Tuscaroras migrated from Carolina and joined the confederacy in The Iroquois are bound in a treaty of friendship with the Ojibway to the North.

The Micmac government was three-tiered, with local, district, and national chiefs, or "Sagamores'. Each settlement's council of elders chose a local chief.

Law/The Micmac V S The Iroquois term paper

The chief was the focus of power in the settlement. The local chief attained position through both hereditary right and meritorious behavior.

The oldest son of a dead chief was usually given first consideration as a successor. These chiefs usually had two assistants or captains. These were called second and third watchers. They would assume command from a sick or incompetent chief. The local chiefs would convene in a district council and select one of their numbers to preside over their meetings and represent the regions' interests.

Councils usually met in the spring or fall, and all decisions were based on unanimity. District Sagamores made up the governing body of the Micmac nation. One district chief would act as Grand Chief. All three of these types of chieftainship followed bloodlines as a natural course of leadership ascendency.

The people expected their chief to be a man of intelligence, knowledge, dignity, courage, generosity, an able hunter, and fearless warrior. Leaders ruled through impeccable example, not force.

The micmac v s the iroquois

The Iroquois confederacy was formalized by a constitution, recorded on wampum belts to preserve the understanding for all generations to follow. Each nation retained its own council and managed its own local affairs.

General control was to be lodged in a federal senate, composed of representatives elected by each nation, holding office during good behavior, and acknowledged as ruling chiefs throughout the whole confederacy. Every nation was further subdivided into clans. Each clan discussed a matter to be brought before the federal council, followed by unanimous agreement between clans.

The head chief would then announce the vote of his nation in the league council. In the Iroquois society, fifty "sachem ships" were created, these men represented their nation's interests on the general council, while continuing to exercise leadership at the local level. Together they formed the executive, legislative, and judicial authority of the league.

Although each nation possessed unique responsibility in the confederacy, no sachem had greater rights than another. Onondaga had 14 representatives; the Cayuga, 10; the Mohawk and Oneida, nine; and the Seneca, eight.

The Iroquois are bound in a treaty of friendship with the Ojibway to the North. The Micmac government was three-tiered, with local, district, and national chiefs, or Sagamores'. Each settlement's council of elders chose a local chief. The Micmac V.S. The Iroquois Although the Micmac and the Iroquois Confederacy are both Aboriginal groups, they have many differences as well as similarities. One area of such, is their traditional justice systems. Their governments and laws are in some ways similar, but in many ways different. The Micmac V.S. the Iroquois Essay The Micmac V.S. The Iroquois Although the Micmac and the Iroquois Confederacy are both Aboriginal groups, they have many differences as well as similarities.

All council decisions were unanimous.The Micmac V.S. The Iroquois. Although the Micmac and the Iroquois Confederacy are both Aboriginal groups, they have many differences as well as similarities.

One area of such, is their traditional justice systems. Their governments and laws are in some ways similar, but in many ways different. The Micmac V.S. The Iroquois Although the Micmac and the Iroquois Confederacy are both Aboriginal groups, they have many differences as well as similarities.

One area of such, is their traditional justice systems. Their governments and laws are in some ways similar, but in many ways different. Although the Micmac and the Iroquois Confederacy are both Aboriginal groups, they have many differences as well as similarities.

One area of such, is their traditional justice systems. Their governments and laws are in some ways . The Micmac V.

The micmac v s the iroquois

S. TheIroquois Although the Micmac and the Iroquois Confederacy are both Aboriginalgroups, they have many differences as well as similarities. . The Micmac V.S. The Iroquois. The difference between law and government structure within these communities.

Although the Micmac and the Iroquois Confederacy are both Aboriginal groups, they have many differences as well a. The Micmac V.S.

The Iroquois Although the Micmac and the Iroquois Confederacy are both Aboriginal groups, they have many differences as well as similarities.

The Micmac V. s. The Iroquois – ustom Literature essay. Comparative Literature